For first-time homebuyers preparing financing on a 6–12 month timeline, everyday debt challenges before a mortgage can quietly become the biggest housing affordability barrier. Carrying balances, juggling payments, or leaning on cards for surprises can shrink what a monthly payment can safely handle, even when income looks solid. Just as important, the credit score impact on a home loan can turn routine debt into higher costs or a delayed approval when lenders take a snapshot of finances. A little short-term financial planning for a home purchase can bring the numbers back into range fast.
When you're trying to buy a home soon, debt payoff works best when it's organized like a simple home project: clear zones, a short checklist, and weekly check-ins. Use these fixes to shrink balances, protect your credit, and keep momentum.
This workflow turns debt payoff into a 6 to 12 month roadmap you can repeat without burnout. You will know what to do each week, what to check each month, and what progress should look like before you talk to a lender.
|
Stage |
Action |
Goal |
|
Map the next 30 days |
Confirm due dates, cash flow, and one target balance |
A realistic plan that fits your paycheck cycle |
|
Schedule the paydown |
Automate minimums; send extra money within 24 hours of payday |
Fewer missed steps and faster principal reduction |
|
Control what gets reported |
Pay cards before statement close; avoid sudden utilization spikes |
Lower reported balances and steadier score movement |
|
Run a monthly check-in |
Compare balances to last month; adjust budget caps and payoff target |
Clear milestones and quick course corrections |
|
Prep for pre-approval |
Gather statements, verify income, and review credit report basics |
Cleaner paperwork and fewer underwriting surprises |
Each stage feeds the next: planning makes payments easier, payments make reporting cleaner, and cleaner reporting makes reviews more encouraging. Repeat the loop monthly and you will see your debt and your readiness move in the same direction.
Q: What are the best strategies to reduce debt before buying a home in the next 6 to 12 months?
A: Focus on one payoff target while keeping every other account current to avoid late marks. Use a simple two-step routine: automate minimum payments, then send extra money within a day of payday. If you carry credit cards, consider paying twice per month to keep reported balances lower.
Q: How can creating a budget help me manage my spending and improve my chances of mortgage approval?
A: A budget turns "I think I can afford it" into numbers a lender can trust. It helps you cap discretionary spending, free up cash for debt paydown, and prevent new balances from creeping in. Keep it simple: fixed bills, debt minimums, savings, then a weekly spending limit.
Q: Which types of debt should I prioritize paying off first when planning to purchase a house soon?
A: Prioritize high-interest revolving debt first, especially credit cards, because it can hurt cash flow and reported utilization. Next, tackle smaller balances you can clear quickly to reduce the number of monthly obligations. Keep installment loans current and avoid taking on new financing right before applying.
Q: What are effective ways to boost my income temporarily to accelerate debt reduction before a home purchase?
A: Look for short-term, trackable income you can commit entirely to debt, like overtime, a seasonal role, or selling unused items. Set a weekly transfer rule so extra earnings go straight to your target balance, not everyday spending. Save pay stubs or deposit records so you can document the income clearly.
Q: If I work with a financial advisor or mortgage specialist, how can they assist me in managing my debt for home buying readiness?
A: They can help you choose a payoff order that improves your application profile, not just your total balance. They can also spot paperwork issues early, including credit file mix-ups like wrong name, phone number, and tell you what statements to gather. For organization, keep a single folder of lender-ready PDFs, correct small form errors with a basic online PDF editing tool, and file everything by the requested deadline.
Buying a home can feel like a race against time, especially when balances, paperwork, and credit worries pile up at once. The steadier path is a proactive debt-management mindset, stay organized, make intentional choices, and keep your plan moving even when it's not perfect. That kind of financial discipline supports long-term credit health, helps a lender see consistency, and strengthens successful home purchase planning on your timeline. Proactive debt management turns today's payments into tomorrow's approval. Choose three immediate actions, one debt move, one document check, and one credit follow-up, and do them this week. That momentum builds stability and resilience that lasts well beyond closing day
Article provided Suzie Wilson
March 17, 2026
California home sales, prices rise in February as mortgage rates ease, C.A.R. reports
SACRAMENTO (March 17) – California home sales perked higher in February as slightly more favorable mortgage rates improved affordability and encouraged more buyers to reenter the market, the CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS® (C.A.R.) said today.
Infographic: https://www.car.org/Global/Infographics/2026-02-Sales-and-Price
Closed escrow sales of existing, single-family detached homes in California reached a seasonally adjusted annualized rate of 274,820 in February, according to data collected by C.A.R. from more than 90 local REALTOR® associations and MLSs statewide. This annualized figure reflects the number of homes that would be sold in 2026 if February's sales pace continued throughout the year, with adjustments made for typical seasonal patterns. February sales were up from 256,910 in January and down 0.3 percent from 275,600 in February 2025.
Despite the uptick, the streak of sub-300,000 seasonally adjusted annualized sales continued for the 41st consecutive month, underscoring the market's persistent weakness over the past few years. While the stronger-than-usual, month-to-month increase in pending sales provides some hope that closed transactions could improve in March, the recent spike in mortgage rates may dampen buyer momentum and keep sales activity subdued in the near term.
"Following a soft start to the year, the housing market regained momentum in February, with both sales and prices showing solid gains," said 2026 C.A.R. President Tamara Suminski, a Southern California broker and REALTOR®. "The conflict in the Middle East is creating some uncertainty for the broader economy and financial markets, which could lead to some short-term hesitation in the housing market. We remain hopeful though that the situation will stabilize in the weeks ahead, allowing market fundamentals and buyer and seller confidence to reassert themselves."
California's median home price increased in February from both the prior month and year ago, bouncing back to $830,370 from a 23-month low reached a month ago. The statewide median price rose 0.9 percent from January, outpacing the long-run average of -0.3 percent observed between January and February. On a year-over-year basis, the median price rose following two consecutive months of annual declines and posted its best growth rate in five months. While prices are expected to climb as the market approaches the spring homebuying season, lingering concerns about the broader economy and the market condition could constrain the pace of price gains in the months ahead.
"While mortgage rates remain below year-ago levels, they recently jumped to their highest level in seven months and could temper buyer momentum as we head into the spring homebuying season," said C.A.R. Senior Vice President and Chief Economist Jordan Levine. "However, many homeowners remain locked in to historically low rates, and inventory remains tight, so any stabilization in rates could help bolster home prices in the spring market despite ongoing affordability and economic challenges."
Other key points from C.A.R.'s February 2026 resale housing report include:
Note: The County MLS median price and sales data in the tables are generated from a survey of more than 90 associations of REALTORS® throughout the state and represent statistics of existing single-family detached homes only. County sales data is not adjusted to account for seasonal factors that can influence home sales. Movements in sales prices should not be interpreted as changes in the cost of a standard home. The median price is where half sold for more and half sold for less; medians are more typical than average prices, which are skewed by a relatively small share of transactions at either the lower end or the upper end. Median prices can be influenced by changes in cost, as well as changes in the characteristics and the size of homes sold. The change in median prices should not be construed as actual price changes in specific homes.
*Sales-to-list-price ratio is an indicator that reflects the negotiation power of home buyers and home sellers under current market conditions. The ratio is calculated by dividing the final sales price of a property by its original list price and is expressed as a percentage. A sales-to-list ratio with 100 percent or above suggests that the property sold for more than the list price, and a ratio below 100 percent indicates that the price sold below the asking price.
**Price per square foot is a measure commonly used by real estate agents and brokers to determine how much a square foot of space a buyer will pay for a property. It is calculated as the sale price of the home divided by the number of finished square feet. C.A.R. currently tracks price-per-square foot statistics for 53 counties.
Leading the way…® in California real estate for 120 years, the CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS® (www.car.org) is one of the largest state trade organizations in the United States with nearly 190,000 members dedicated to the advancement of professionalism in real estate. C.A.R. is headquartered in Sacramento.
# # #
February 2026 County Sales and Price Activity
(and condo sales data not seasonally adjusted)
|
February 2026 |
Median Sold Price of Existing Single-Family Homes |
Sales |
|||||||
|
State/Region/County |
February 2026 |
January 2026 |
|
February 2025 |
|
Price MTM% Chg |
Price YTY% Chg |
Sales MTM% Chg |
Sales YTY% Chg |
|
Calif. Single-family home |
$830,370 |
$822,630 |
r |
$829,060 |
|
0.9% |
0.2% |
7.0% |
-0.3% |
|
Calif. Condo/Townhome |
$645,000 |
$625,000 |
|
$675,000 |
|
3.2% |
-4.4% |
28.0% |
1.2% |
|
Los Angeles Metro Area |
$812,950 |
$808,000 |
|
$824,880 |
|
0.6% |
-1.4% |
11.5% |
-1.8% |
|
Central Coast |
$1,047,500 |
$1,091,180 |
|
$1,039,500 |
|
-4.0% |
0.8% |
21.2% |
6.2% |
|
Central Valley |
$485,000 |
$480,000 |
|
$495,000 |
|
1.0% |
-2.0% |
15.4% |
0.6% |
|
Far North |
$378,000 |
$379,950 |
|
$386,000 |
|
-0.5% |
-2.1% |
-12.6% |
-2.9% |
|
Inland Empire |
$601,350 |
$595,000 |
|
$611,290 |
|
1.1% |
-1.6% |
9.0% |
-3.7% |
|
San Francisco Bay Area |
$1,285,000 |
$1,127,000 |
|
$1,250,000 |
|
14.0% |
2.8% |
44.1% |
4.0% |
|
Southern California |
$861,880 |
$845,530 |
|
$866,360 |
|
1.9% |
-0.5% |
13.7% |
-0.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
San Francisco Bay Area |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alameda |
$1,303,500 |
$1,120,010 |
|
$1,300,000 |
|
16.4% |
0.3% |
33.8% |
-4.5% |
|
Contra Costa |
$819,000 |
$802,000 |
|
$841,000 |
|
2.1% |
-2.6% |
31.2% |
0.0% |
|
Marin |
$1,575,000 |
$1,527,000 |
|
$1,675,000 |
|
3.1% |
-6.0% |
58.3% |
17.3% |
|
Napa |
$837,000 |
$1,002,500 |
|
$1,018,500 |
|
-16.5% |
-17.8% |
30.0% |
18.2% |
|
San Francisco |
$1,976,000 |
$1,653,320 |
|
$1,600,000 |
|
19.5% |
23.5% |
93.3% |
4.3% |
|
San Mateo |
$2,250,000 |
$2,000,000 |
|
$2,200,000 |
|
12.5% |
2.3% |
39.9% |
12.9% |
|
Santa Clara |
$2,016,000 |
$1,807,500 |
|
$2,000,000 |
|
11.5% |
0.8% |
70.1% |
13.7% |
|
Solano |
$565,400 |
$552,500 |
|
$600,000 |
|
2.3% |
-5.8% |
41.4% |
0.4% |
|
Sonoma |
$809,500 |
$799,000 |
|
$852,560 |
|
1.3% |
-5.1% |
28.3% |
0.0% |
|
Southern California |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Imperial |
$447,500 |
$455,000 |
|
$394,000 |
|
-1.6% |
13.6% |
22.9% |
-10.4% |
|
Los Angeles |
$842,660 |
$879,720 |
|
$852,190 |
|
-4.2% |
-1.1% |
14.2% |
-0.3% |
|
Orange |
$1,432,500 |
$1,410,000 |
|
$1,465,500 |
|
1.6% |
-2.3% |
9.3% |
-3.6% |
|
Riverside |
$631,000 |
$639,440 |
|
$646,840 |
|
-1.3% |
-2.4% |
20.4% |
-4.0% |
|
San Bernardino |
$510,000 |
$500,990 |
|
$490,000 |
|
1.8% |
4.1% |
-14.7% |
0.5% |
|
San Diego |
$1,050,000 |
$1,050,000 |
|
$1,040,000 |
|
0.0% |
1.0% |
22.2% |
4.6% |
|
Ventura |
$930,000 |
$917,500 |
|
$969,500 |
|
1.4% |
-4.1% |
16.8% |
7.3% |
|
Central Coast |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Monterey |
$880,000 |
$998,750 |
|
$900,000 |
|
-11.9% |
-2.2% |
17.3% |
7.5% |
|
San Luis Obispo |
$990,000 |
$950,000 |
|
$967,500 |
|
4.2% |
2.3% |
15.1% |
-5.8% |
|
Santa Barbara |
$1,215,000 |
$1,475,000 |
|
$1,515,000 |
|
-17.6% |
-19.8% |
15.5% |
-0.7% |
|
Santa Cruz |
$1,275,000 |
$1,237,500 |
|
$1,260,000 |
|
3.0% |
1.2% |
53.6% |
53.6% |
|
Central Valley |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresno |
$426,250 |
$429,990 |
r |
$442,850 |
|
-0.9% |
-3.7% |
27.7% |
8.3% |
|
Glenn |
$370,000 |
$340,000 |
|
$335,000 |
|
8.8% |
10.4% |
100.0% |
40.0% |
|
Kern |
$410,000 |
$398,220 |
|
$409,900 |
|
3.0% |
0.0% |
5.9% |
-12.4% |
|
Kings |
$356,990 |
$383,000 |
|
$375,000 |
|
-6.8% |
-4.8% |
0.0% |
23.3% |
|
Madera |
$435,000 |
$412,000 |
|
$425,000 |
|
5.6% |
2.4% |
64.4% |
-9.3% |
|
Merced |
$402,990 |
$409,750 |
|
$414,500 |
|
-1.6% |
-2.8% |
23.9% |
38.3% |
|
Placer |
$639,980 |
$625,000 |
|
$649,000 |
|
2.4% |
-1.4% |
16.7% |
-4.2% |
|
Sacramento |
$545,000 |
$540,000 |
|
$550,000 |
|
0.9% |
-0.9% |
20.7% |
8.0% |
|
San Benito |
$821,000 |
$859,900 |
|
$780,000 |
|
-4.5% |
5.3% |
12.0% |
3.7% |
|
San Joaquin |
$525,000 |
$530,000 |
|
$540,000 |
|
-0.9% |
-2.8% |
11.8% |
-15.1% |
|
Stanislaus |
$462,500 |
$477,000 |
|
$460,000 |
|
-3.0% |
0.5% |
1.4% |
8.0% |
|
Tulare |
$381,000 |
$375,000 |
|
$380,000 |
|
1.6% |
0.3% |
-8.8% |
-8.3% |
|
Far North |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Butte |
$435,750 |
$445,000 |
|
$449,000 |
|
-2.1% |
-3.0% |
-7.7% |
-17.8% |
|
Lassen |
$199,000 |
$255,000 |
|
$284,500 |
|
-22.0% |
-30.1% |
-10.0% |
12.5% |
|
Plumas |
$485,000 |
$350,000 |
|
$359,500 |
|
38.6% |
34.9% |
-28.6% |
-28.6% |
|
Shasta |
$386,500 |
$386,000 |
|
$386,000 |
|
0.1% |
0.1% |
-6.6% |
5.2% |
|
Siskiyou |
$285,000 |
$359,000 |
|
$285,000 |
|
-20.6% |
0.0% |
-9.5% |
-20.8% |
|
Tehama |
$323,630 |
$347,000 |
|
$360,000 |
|
-6.7% |
-10.1% |
-37.5% |
53.8% |
|
Trinity |
$374,250 |
$290,000 |
|
$115,000 |
|
29.1% |
225.4% |
-50.0% |
-20.0% |
|
Other Calif. Counties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amador |
$445,000 |
$430,000 |
|
$460,000 |
|
3.5% |
-3.3% |
22.2% |
-15.4% |
|
Calaveras |
$452,920 |
$475,000 |
r |
$415,000 |
|
-4.6% |
9.1% |
2.3% |
7.1% |
|
Del Norte |
$335,000 |
$460,000 |
|
$352,000 |
|
-27.2% |
-4.8% |
66.7% |
25.0% |
|
El Dorado |
$700,000 |
$705,380 |
|
$677,000 |
|
-0.8% |
3.4% |
17.7% |
-11.0% |
|
Humboldt |
$430,000 |
$384,000 |
|
$431,000 |
|
12.0% |
-0.2% |
-21.5% |
-15.1% |
|
Lake |
$338,950 |
$312,000 |
|
$352,500 |
|
8.6% |
-3.8% |
25.0% |
-13.0% |
|
Mariposa |
$520,000 |
$369,750 |
|
$410,000 |
|
40.6% |
26.8% |
-8.3% |
57.1% |
|
Mendocino |
$481,500 |
$480,000 |
|
$535,500 |
|
0.3% |
-10.1% |
0.0% |
18.5% |
|
Mono |
$2,350,000 |
$1,564,500 |
|
$1,350,000 |
|
50.2% |
74.1% |
-50.0% |
-57.1% |
|
Nevada |
$532,000 |
$578,500 |
|
$512,950 |
|
-8.0% |
3.7% |
1.5% |
11.3% |
|
Sutter |
$464,040 |
$460,000 |
|
$417,500 |
|
0.9% |
11.1% |
25.9% |
-19.0% |
|
Tuolumne |
$362,500 |
$420,000 |
|
$381,000 |
|
-13.7% |
-4.9% |
-10.2% |
7.3% |
|
Yolo |
$600,000 |
$559,200 |
|
$633,500 |
|
7.3% |
-5.3% |
0.0% |
-10.8% |
|
Yuba |
$430,000 |
$449,950 |
|
$459,000 |
|
-4.4% |
-6.3% |
32.5% |
-18.5% |
r = revised
NA = not available
February 2026 County Unsold Inventory and Days on Market
(Regional and condo sales data not seasonally adjusted)
|
February 2026 |
Unsold Inventory Index |
Median Time on Market |
||||||||
|
State/Region/County |
Feb. 2026 |
Jan. 2026 |
|
Feb. 2025 |
|
Feb. 2026 |
Jan. 2026 |
|
Feb. 2025 |
|
|
Calif. Single-family home |
4.0 |
4.4 |
|
4.0 |
|
29.0 |
40.0 |
r |
26.0 |
|
|
Calif. Condo/Townhome |
4.7 |
5.6 |
|
4.2 |
|
35.0 |
49.0 |
|
28.0 |
|
|
Los Angeles Metro Area |
4.3 |
4.6 |
|
4.3 |
|
36.0 |
41.0 |
|
34.0 |
|
|
Central Coast |
3.9 |
4.5 |
|
4.1 |
|
31.5 |
37.5 |
|
26.5 |
|
|
Central Valley |
4.0 |
4.4 |
|
3.9 |
|
30.0 |
39.0 |
|
26.0 |
|
|
Far North |
6.2 |
5.3 |
|
5.8 |
|
45.5 |
55.0 |
|
42.5 |
|
|
Inland Empire |
4.9 |
5.3 |
|
5.1 |
|
48.0 |
49.0 |
|
43.0 |
|
|
San Francisco Bay Area |
2.8 |
3.5 |
|
3.2 |
|
14.5 |
32.0 |
|
13.0 |
|
|
Southern California |
4.1 |
4.4 |
|
4.1 |
|
32.0 |
39.0 |
|
30.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
San Francisco Bay Area |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alameda |
2.5 |
2.8 |
|
3.0 |
|
12.0 |
17.0 |
|
11.0 |
|
|
Contra Costa |
3.0 |
3.6 |
|
3.4 |
|
13.0 |
29.0 |
|
11.5 |
|
|
Marin |
2.8 |
3.8 |
|
3.5 |
|
63.0 |
95.0 |
|
52.0 |
|
|
Napa |
7.3 |
8.6 |
|
8.4 |
|
105.0 |
112.5 |
|
99.5 |
|
|
San Francisco |
1.6 |
2.4 |
|
2.2 |
|
29.0 |
23.0 |
|
37.0 |
|
|
San Mateo |
2.4 |
2.5 |
|
2.5 |
|
9.0 |
13.0 |
|
9.0 |
|
|
Santa Clara |
2.4 |
2.9 |
|
2.5 |
|
8.0 |
11.0 |
|
8.0 |
|
|
Solano |
3.3 |
4.2 |
|
3.2 |
|
55.0 |
59.0 |
|
46.0 |
|
|
Sonoma |
4.0 |
4.5 |
|
4.3 |
|
79.5 |
95.0 |
|
73.5 |
|
|
Southern California |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Imperial |
3.9 |
5.1 |
|
3.2 |
|
18.0 |
23.0 |
|
33.5 |
|
|
Los Angeles |
4.2 |
4.5 |
|
4.1 |
|
32.0 |
38.0 |
|
30.0 |
|
|
Orange |
3.5 |
3.4 |
|
3.4 |
|
24.0 |
35.0 |
|
23.0 |
|
|
Riverside |
4.7 |
5.6 |
|
4.9 |
|
50.0 |
50.0 |
|
45.0 |
|
|
San Bernardino |
5.6 |
4.9 |
|
5.7 |
|
47.0 |
49.0 |
|
39.0 |
|
|
San Diego |
3.2 |
3.6 |
|
3.4 |
|
18.0 |
29.0 |
|
16.0 |
|
|
Ventura |
3.9 |
4.2 |
|
4.0 |
|
35.5 |
52.0 |
|
36.0 |
|
|
Central Coast |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Monterey |
4.4 |
4.9 |
|
4.5 |
|
33.0 |
39.0 |
|
19.0 |
|
|
San Luis Obispo |
3.9 |
4.1 |
|
3.6 |
|
51.0 |
55.0 |
|
48.0 |
|
|
Santa Barbara |
3.6 |
4.1 |
|
3.6 |
|
18.5 |
22.0 |
|
18.0 |
|
|
Santa Cruz |
3.6 |
5.1 |
|
5.8 |
|
21.5 |
43.0 |
|
18.0 |
|
|
Central Valley |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresno |
4.6 |
5.6 |
|
4.4 |
|
27.0 |
34.0 |
|
26.5 |
|
|
Glenn |
2.8 |
5.4 |
|
4.9 |
|
89.0 |
41.0 |
|
56.5 |
|
|
Kern |
4.2 |
4.5 |
|
3.7 |
|
32.0 |
38.0 |
|
22.0 |
|
|
Kings |
3.7 |
3.5 |
|
4.4 |
|
40.0 |
33.0 |
|
30.0 |
|
|
Madera |
5.4 |
9.1 |
|
5.7 |
|
51.0 |
35.0 |
|
32.0 |
|
|
Merced |
3.4 |
4.3 |
|
4.3 |
|
39.0 |
29.0 |
|
32.0 |
|
|
Placer |
3.6 |
3.8 |
|
3.5 |
|
32.0 |
51.0 |
|
27.0 |
|
|
Sacramento |
3.0 |
3.3 |
|
3.1 |
|
25.0 |
40.0 |
|
21.0 |
|
|
San Benito |
4.2 |
4.2 |
|
4.6 |
|
41.0 |
58.0 |
|
22.0 |
|
|
San Joaquin |
5.2 |
5.3 |
|
4.1 |
|
44.0 |
42.0 |
|
31.0 |
|
|
Stanislaus |
4.0 |
3.9 |
|
4.2 |
|
26.5 |
32.0 |
|
26.0 |
|
|
Tulare |
4.1 |
4.5 |
|
4.0 |
|
26.0 |
33.0 |
|
39.0 |
|
|
Far North |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Butte |
5.3 |
4.3 |
|
4.0 |
|
28.5 |
37.0 |
|
30.0 |
|
|
Lassen |
4.2 |
5.3 |
|
11.3 |
|
268.0 |
141.5 |
|
85.5 |
|
|
Plumas |
9.0 |
5.9 |
|
7.7 |
|
190.0 |
99.5 |
|
130.5 |
|
|
Shasta |
5.2 |
5.0 |
|
5.2 |
|
36.5 |
49.0 |
|
27.0 |
|
|
Siskiyou |
10.8 |
8.9 |
|
7.1 |
|
103.0 |
35.0 |
|
138.5 |
|
|
Tehama |
7.4 |
4.7 |
|
9.1 |
|
61.0 |
99.0 |
|
35.0 |
|
|
Trinity |
22.5 |
12.3 |
|
19.2 |
|
195.5 |
85.0 |
|
250.0 |
|
|
Other Calif. Counties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amador |
7.3 |
9.1 |
|
5.6 |
|
69.0 |
73.0 |
|
65.0 |
|
|
Calaveras |
8.4 |
7.5 |
r |
7.0 |
|
40.0 |
54.0 |
r |
75.0 |
|
|
Del Norte |
5.2 |
8.4 |
|
6.8 |
|
63.0 |
73.0 |
|
34.5 |
|
|
El Dorado |
4.8 |
5.4 |
|
4.8 |
|
59.5 |
59.5 |
|
45.5 |
|
|
Humboldt |
7.2 |
5.7 |
|
7.0 |
|
52.0 |
31.0 |
|
69.0 |
|
|
Lake |
10.3 |
12.6 |
|
8.3 |
|
71.5 |
50.5 |
|
37.0 |
|
|
Mariposa |
9.0 |
7.9 |
|
13.3 |
|
127.0 |
5.0 |
|
64.0 |
|
|
Mendocino |
10.3 |
10.1 |
|
12.4 |
|
131.5 |
168.0 |
|
116.0 |
|
|
Mono |
4.7 |
3.2 |
|
3.0 |
|
77.0 |
29.0 |
|
106.0 |
|
|
Nevada |
4.1 |
4.0 |
|
5.6 |
|
62.0 |
82.5 |
|
52.0 |
|
|
Sutter |
4.9 |
5.6 |
|
3.1 |
|
41.5 |
43.0 |
|
61.5 |
|
|
Tuolumne |
6.3 |
6.0 |
|
9.0 |
|
85.0 |
75.0 |
|
92.0 |
|
|
Yolo |
3.5 |
3.5 |
|
3.2 |
|
26.5 |
47.0 |
|
39.0 |
|
|
Yuba |
4.5 |
5.8 |
|
4.3 |
|
28.0 |
53.0 |
|
49.0 |
|
Article belongs to CAR.org