Posts with tag 'estate'

Sunshine Properties Blog

Subscribe and receive email notifications of new blog posts.




rss logo RSS Feed
Uncategorized | 837 Posts
August
23

For release:
August 20, 2024   

California home sales reach five-month high as mortgage rates hit lows, C.A.R. reports

  • Existing, single-family home sales totaled 279,810 in July on a seasonally adjusted annualized rate, up 3.6 percent from 270,200 in June and up 4.1 percent from 268,840 in July 2023.

  • July's statewide median home price was $886,560, down 1.6 percent from June and up 6.5 percent from $832,530 in July 2023.

  • Year-to-date statewide home sales inched up 0.2 percent.

LOS ANGELES (Aug. 20) – Fueled by the lowest interest rates since spring, California home sales rebounded in July to reach a five-month high, the CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS® (C.A.R.) said today.

 

Infographic: https://www.car.org/Global/Infographics/2024-07-Sales-and-Price


Closed escrow sales of existing, single-family detached homes in California totaled a seasonally adjusted annualized rate of 279,810 in July, according to information collected by C.A.R. from more than 90 local REALTOR
® associations and MLSs statewide. The statewide annualized sales figure represents what would be the total number of homes sold during 2024 if sales maintained the July pace throughout the year. It is adjusted to account for seasonal factors that typically influence home sales.

July's sales pace rose 3.6 percent from the revised 270,200 homes sold in June and were up 4.1 percent from a year ago, when a revised 268,840 homes were sold on an annualized basis. The sales pace has remained below the 300,000-threshold for 22 consecutive months, and year-to-date home sales edged up 0.2 percent from the first seven months of 2023.

"California's housing market kicked off the second half of the year with a moderate increase in home sales in July as interest rates continued their downward trend," said C.A.R. President Melanie Barker, a Yosemite REALTOR®. "Despite transitioning into the off-season, the market should remain vibrant in the coming months if the availability of homes for sale continues to improve, and mortgage rates moderate further in the third and fourth quarters."

The statewide median price slipped in July for the second month in a row, after setting a record high in May. July's median price dipped 1.6 percent from $900,720 in June to $886,560 in July. California's median home price was 6.5 percent higher than the $832,530 recorded in July 2023. The year-over-year gain was the 13th straight month of annual price increases, albeit the smallest since January. Home prices could soften further in coming months but should continue to register moderate year-over-year growth for the rest of the year.

 

Stronger sales momentum in the higher-priced market segment continued to contribute to median price growth. The $1 million-and-higher segment rose year-over-year in July by 24.5 percent, while sales in the sub-$500,000 segment dropped 1.6 percent. While sales of homes priced above $1 million were down for the second straight month, they made up 35.4 percent of all sales in July, near the recent high recorded in May 2024.

 

"As the economy showed more signs of cooling in the past couple of months, mortgage rates continued to come down, reaching the lowest level in 15 months," said C.A.R. Senior Vice President and Chief Economist Jordan Levine. "This improvement in lower borrowing costs could motivate homebuyers on the sideline to reenter the market, especially since home prices began to soften at the tail end of the homebuying season."  

Other key points from C.A.R.'s July 2024 resale housing report include:

  • At the regional level, home sales in all major regions, except for one, bounced back and rose higher than year-ago levels in July. Four out of the five regions in the state registered increases from the same month of last year, with the San Francisco Bay Area (19.2 percent) increasing the most. That was followed by Southern California (11.4 percent) and the Central Valley (10.3 percent) regions, which also grew by double-digits year-over-year. Sales in the Central Coast (5.8 percent) also grew from last year but at a more modest level. The Far North (-0.5 percent) was the only region that recorded sales lower than a year ago, due at least partly to the Park Fire that began in late July.

  • Forty of the 53 counties tracked by C.A.R. recorded sales increases from a year ago, with sales in 25 of them jumping more than 10 percent year-over-year. Trinity (100 percent) posted the largest yearly sales gain, followed by San Benito (37 percent), and San Francisco (34.8 percent). Eleven counties registered sales decreases from last year, with sales in six of them falling more than 10 percent year-over-year and sales in two counties dropping more than 20 percent. Imperial (-29.5 percent) had the biggest annual sales decline in July, followed by Tuolumne (-24.4 percent) and Butte (-19.1 percent).
  • At the regional level, all major regions experienced an increase in their median price from a year ago in July. The Central Coast posted the biggest price jump on a year-over-year basis, increasing 8.0 percent from a year ago. Southern California (6.1 percent) was a close second and together, they were the only two regions to record an annual price gain of more than 5 percent. The San Francisco Bay Area (3.6 percent) came in third, with the Far North (3.1 percent) and the Central Valley (2.2 percent) trailing behind.

  • Home prices continued to grow on a year-over-year basis throughout the state, with median sales prices in 35 counties rising from a year ago in July. Plumas (45.0 percent) experienced the biggest price increase last month, followed by San Luis Obispo (20.3 percent) and Del Norte (14.6 percent). Eighteen counties registered declines in their median prices from last year, with Tuolumne dropping the most at 16.9 percent, followed by Santa Barbara (-16.8 percent), and Mono (-13.4 percent).

  • The statewide unsold inventory index (UII), which measures the number of months needed to sell the supply of homes on the market at the current sales rate was mixed. The index was 2.9 months in July, down from 3.0 months in June and up from 2.5 months in July 2023. Active listings at the state level rose 39.0 percent on a year-over year basis. It was the sixth straight month of annual gains in for-sale properties and the highest since January of last year. With mortgage rates likely to moderate in coming months, further improvement in the supply side could be observed in the market for the rest of the year as the lock-in effect continues to ease.

  • At the county level, the availability of homes for sale increased from a year ago in all but three counties in July. Yuba (75 percent) had the biggest year-over-year jump, followed by Calaveras (74.1 percent) and Alameda (71.7 percent). The only counties with a dip in homes for sale from last year were San Francisco (-18 percent), Glenn (-17.1 percent) and Trinity (-7.6 percent).

  • New active listings at the state level increased from a year ago for the seventh consecutive month. With mortgage rates moderating throughout the month, the pace of growth accelerated in July (19.5 percent) after slowing to a single-digit growth rate in June. Forty-one of the 52 counties tracked by C.A.R. recorded an increase in new active listings from a year ago. Napa recorded the largest increase on a year-over-year basis at 62.3 percent, followed by Yuba (51.5 percent) and Solano (48.8 percent). Nine counties posted declines in new active listings from a year ago, with Trinity (-30.8 percent) dropping the sharpest, followed by Mariposa (-19.4 percent) and Kings (-10.1 percent).
  • The median number of days it took to sell a California single-family home was 20 days in July and 16 days in July 2023.
  • C.A.R.'s statewide sales-price-to-list-price ratio* was 100.0 percent in July 2024 and 100.0 percent in July 2023.

  • The statewide average price per square foot** for an existing single-family home was $437, up from $408 in July a year ago.

  • The 30-year, fixed-mortgage interest rate averaged 6.85 percent in July, up from 6.71 percent in July 2023, according to C.A.R.'s calculations based on Freddie Mac's weekly mortgage survey data.

Note:  The County MLS median price and sales data in the tables are generated from a survey of more than 90 associations of REALTORS® throughout the state and represent statistics of existing single-family detached homes only. County sales data is not adjusted to account for seasonal factors that can influence home sales. Movements in sales prices should not be interpreted as changes in the cost of a standard home. The median price is where half sold for more and half sold for less; medians are more typical than average prices, which are skewed by a relatively small share of transactions at either the lower end or the upper end. Median prices can be influenced by changes in cost, as well as changes in the characteristics and the size of homes sold. The change in median prices should not be construed as actual price changes in specific homes.

*Sales-to-list-price ratio is an indicator that reflects the negotiation power of home buyers and home sellers under current market conditions. The ratio is calculated by dividing the final sales price of a property by its original list price and is expressed as a percentage. A sales-to-list ratio with 100 percent or above suggests that the property sold for more than the list price, and a ratio below 100 percent indicates that the price sold below the asking price.

**Price per square foot is a measure commonly used by real estate agents and brokers to determine how much a square foot of space a buyer will pay for a property. It is calculated as the sale price of the home divided by the number of finished square feet. C.A.R. currently tracks price-per-square foot statistics for 53 counties.

Leading the way…® in California real estate for more than 118 years, the CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS® (www.car.org) is one of the largest state trade organizations in the United States with more than 180,000 members dedicated to the advancement of professionalism in real estate. C.A.R. is headquartered in Los Angeles.

# # #

July 2024 County Sales and Price Activity
(Regional and condo sales data not seasonally adjusted)

July 2024

Median Sold Price of Existing Single-Family Homes

Sales

State/Region/County

July

2024

June

2024

 

July

2023

 

Price MTM% Chg

Price YTY% Chg

Sales MTM% Chg

Sales YTY% Chg

Calif. Single-family home

$886,560

$900,720

 

$832,530

r

-1.6%

6.5%

3.6%

4.1%

Calif. Condo/Townhome

$680,000

$697,000

 

$645,000

 

-2.4%

5.4%

8.5%

11.8%

Los Angeles Metro Area

$849,000

$835,000

 

$790,000

 

1.7%

7.5%

3.5%

11.8%

Central Coast

$1,064,000

$1,072,000

 

$985,000

 

-0.7%

8.0%

9.7%

5.8%

Central Valley

$500,000

$503,000

 

$489,000

 

-0.6%

2.2%

6.9%

10.3%

Far North

$386,450

$409,000

 

$375,000

 

-5.5%

3.1%

15.0%

-0.5%

Inland Empire

$600,000

$600,000

 

$575,000

 

0.0%

4.3%

6.6%

15.2%

San Francisco Bay Area

$1,300,000

$1,400,000

 

$1,255,000

 

-7.1%

3.6%

1.3%

19.2%

Southern California

$881,000

$875,000

 

$830,000

 

0.7%

6.1%

4.9%

11.4%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

San Francisco Bay Area

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Alameda

$1,280,000

$1,369,210

 

$1,260,000

 

-6.5%

1.6%

8.2%

24.9%

Contra Costa

$916,500

$903,000

 

$900,000

 

1.5%

1.8%

-3.8%

3.6%

Marin

$1,594,000

$1,800,000

 

$1,609,500

 

-11.4%

-1.0%

4.2%

16.0%

Napa

$1,052,500

$952,500

 

$927,500

 

10.5%

13.5%

7.6%

-4.1%

San Francisco

$1,600,000

$1,650,000

 

$1,460,000

 

-3.0%

9.6%

6.1%

34.8%

San Mateo

$2,100,000

$2,110,000

 

$1,984,000

 

-0.5%

5.8%

-8.5%

18.2%

Santa Clara

$1,880,000

$1,955,000

 

$1,800,000

 

-3.8%

4.4%

-2.1%

30.5%

Solano

$586,400

$601,250

 

$600,560

 

-2.5%

-2.4%

0.0%

15.2%

Sonoma

$850,000

$835,000

 

$850,960

 

1.8%

-0.1%

10.4%

24.5%

Southern California

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Imperial

$385,000

$385,000

 

$387,500

 

0.0%

-0.6%

-27.9%

-29.5%

Los Angeles

$909,010

$889,180

 

$851,540

 

2.2%

6.7%

-1.5%

9.1%

Orange

$1,390,000

$1,450,000

 

$1,300,000

 

-4.1%

6.9%

8.1%

12.4%

Riverside

$650,000

$643,500

 

$615,000

 

1.0%

5.7%

7.0%

11.5%

San Bernardino

$515,000

$522,500

 

$485,000

 

-1.4%

6.2%

6.0%

22.4%

San Diego

$1,020,000

$1,054,180

 

$969,020

 

-3.2%

5.3%

11.8%

11.1%

Ventura

$972,000

$964,500

 

$920,000

 

0.8%

5.7%

5.4%

7.9%

Central Coast

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Monterey

$945,000

$1,039,000

 

$949,000

 

-9.0%

-0.4%

10.2%

1.4%

San Luis Obispo

$1,035,000

$890,000

 

$860,000

 

16.3%

20.3%

8.4%

1.5%

Santa Barbara

$827,500

$1,355,500

 

$994,470

 

-39.0%

-16.8%

6.0%

15.8%

Santa Cruz

$1,355,000

$1,413,000

 

$1,300,000

 

-4.1%

4.2%

17.0%

5.6%

Central Valley

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fresno

$420,000

$428,890

 

$417,500

 

-2.1%

0.6%

3.2%

6.9%

Glenn

$330,500

$350,000

 

$372,500

 

-5.6%

-11.3%

100.0%

-11.1%

Kern

$413,000

$375,000

 

$395,000

 

10.1%

4.6%

-2.9%

11.4%

Kings

$369,000

$391,400

 

$385,000

 

-5.7%

-4.2%

47.3%

2.5%

Madera

$424,350

$415,070

 

$426,000

 

2.2%

-0.4%

28.2%

21.0%

Merced

$413,500

$421,000

 

$390,000

 

-1.8%

6.0%

-10.4%

6.2%

Placer

$670,000

$685,000

 

$660,000

 

-2.2%

1.5%

1.8%

8.3%

Sacramento

$560,000

$560,000

 

$547,000

 

0.0%

2.4%

13.7%

14.9%

San Benito

$778,000

$854,000

 

$745,000

 

-8.9%

4.4%

27.6%

37.0%

San Joaquin

$585,000

$550,000

 

$545,000

 

6.4%

7.3%

-1.7%

0.2%

Stanislaus

$485,000

$495,000

 

$465,000

 

-2.0%

4.3%

5.2%

12.0%

Tulare

$380,000

$375,000

 

$370,520

 

1.3%

2.6%

16.1%

14.5%

Far North

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Butte

$430,000

$475,900

 

$429,000

 

-9.6%

0.2%

9.9%

-19.1%

Lassen

$265,000

$267,500

 

$280,000

 

-0.9%

-5.4%

14.3%

33.3%

Plumas

$528,000

$465,000

 

$364,050

 

13.5%

45.0%

17.9%

-2.9%

Shasta

$394,450

$396,950

 

$379,000

 

-0.6%

4.1%

13.0%

6.9%

Siskiyou

$326,770

$362,120

 

$296,000

 

-9.8%

10.4%

69.2%

10.0%

Tehama

$290,000

$375,000

 

$320,000

 

-22.7%

-9.4%

-3.3%

-17.1%

Trinity

$297,500

$322,100

 

$320,000

 

-7.6%

-7.0%

0.0%

100.0%

Other Calif. Counties

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amador

$399,000

$450,000

 

$442,000

 

-11.3%

-9.7%

0.0%

12.5%

Calaveras

$474,000

$495,000

 

$476,500

 

-4.2%

-0.5%

30.3%

34.4%

Del Norte

$400,000

$350,000

 

$349,000

 

14.3%

14.6%

0.0%

0.0%

El Dorado

$695,000

$709,000

 

$650,000

 

-2.0%

6.9%

21.9%

5.1%

Humboldt

$442,500

$490,620

 

$465,000

 

-9.8%

-4.8%

25.0%

12.2%

Lake

$350,000

$352,500

 

$335,000

 

-0.7%

4.5%

-3.1%

-4.6%

Mariposa

$472,500

$374,500

 

$459,000

 

26.2%

2.9%

-25.0%

-14.3%

Mendocino

$549,500

$521,690

 

$540,000

 

5.3%

1.8%

25.0%

13.2%

Mono

$680,000

$1,240,000

 

$785,000

 

-45.2%

-13.4%

57.1%

0.0%

Nevada

$609,480

$625,000

 

$579,900

 

-2.5%

5.1%

31.2%

18.4%

Sutter

$435,000

$500,000

 

$402,000

 

-13.0%

8.2%

-20.0%

-10.0%

Tuolumne

$385,000

$439,500

 

$463,500

 

-12.4%

-16.9%

25.9%

-24.4%

Yolo

$610,000

$649,500

 

$625,000

 

-6.1%

-2.4%

0.0%

5.6%

Yuba

$438,400

$446,750

 

$415,000

 

-1.9%

5.6%

18.8%

-2.6%

r = revised
NA = not available

  

July 2024 County Unsold Inventory and Days on Market
(Regional and condo sales data not seasonally adjusted)

July 2024

Unsold Inventory Index

Median Time on Market

State/Region/County

July

2024

June

2024

 

July

2023

 

July

2024

June

2024

 

July

2023

 

Calif. Single-family home

2.9

3.0

 

2.5

 

20.0

18.0

 

16.0

 

Calif. Condo/Townhome

3.0

3.2

 

2.4

 

22.0

20.0

 

16.0

 

Los Angeles Metro Area

3.0

3.2

 

2.7

 

22.0

21.0

 

19.0

 

Central Coast

3.3

3.5

 

2.7

 

18.0

16.0

 

14.0

 

Central Valley

2.8

2.8

 

2.4

 

19.0

17.0

 

14.0

 

Far North

4.6

5.4

 

4.1

 

33.0

24.0

 

21.0

 

Inland Empire

3.4

3.7

 

3.1

 

27.0

26.5

 

22.0

 

San Francisco Bay Area

2.0

2.0

 

1.8

 

17.0

14.0

 

14.0

 

Southern California

2.9

3.1

 

2.5

 

21.0

20.0

 

17.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

San Francisco Bay Area

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Alameda

1.6

1.8

 

1.3

 

13.0

12.0

 

11.0

 

Contra Costa

1.8

1.8

 

1.4

 

13.0

12.5

 

12.0

 

Marin

1.8

2.3

 

1.7

 

57.0

39.0

 

43.0

 

Napa

5.5

5.6

 

4.0

 

63.0

52.0

 

54.5

 

San Francisco

1.4

1.8

 

2.1

 

27.0

34.0

 

35.0

 

San Mateo

2.0

1.7

 

2.1

 

12.0

11.0

 

11.0

 

Santa Clara

1.6

1.5

 

1.6

 

9.0

8.0

 

8.0

 

Solano

2.7

2.7

 

2.1

 

44.0

35.0

 

35.0

 

Sonoma

3.1

3.4

 

3.1

 

54.0

45.0

 

46.0

 

Southern California

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Imperial

3.4

2.1

 

NA

 

24.0

13.0

 

13.0

 

Los Angeles

3.0

3.1

 

2.5

 

19.0

19.0

 

17.0

 

Orange

2.5

2.5

 

2.3

 

20.0

18.0

 

18.0

 

Riverside

3.1

3.3

 

2.7

 

28.0

27.0

 

23.0

 

San Bernardino

4.0

4.2

 

4.0

 

25.0

25.0

 

19.0

 

San Diego

2.6

2.7

 

2.0

 

16.0

14.0

 

12.0

 

Ventura

2.8

2.8

 

2.3

 

30.0

27.0

 

25.0

 

Central Coast

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Monterey

3.8

4.3

 

3.2

 

17.0

10.5

 

13.0

 

San Luis Obispo

2.9

3.1

 

2.4

 

23.0

22.0

 

21.0

 

Santa Barbara

3.3

3.3

 

2.7

 

16.5

13.0

 

10.0

 

Santa Cruz

3.2

3.4

 

2.7

 

17.0

15.0

 

14.0

 

Central Valley

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fresno

2.9

2.9

 

2.6

 

15.0

15.0

 

12.0

 

Glenn

2.6

5.8

 

2.8

 

27.0

23.0

 

19.5

 

Kern

2.5

2.3

 

2.3

 

19.0

17.0

 

12.0

 

Kings

2.1

3.4

 

2.0

 

17.0

16.0

 

12.0

 

Madera

4.2

5.2

 

4.0

 

23.0

32.5

 

32.0

 

Merced

2.8

2.4

 

2.8

 

23.5

20.0

 

16.0

 

Placer

2.8

2.6

 

2.3

 

21.0

24.0

 

18.0

 

Sacramento

2.4

2.5

 

1.9

 

19.0

17.0

 

13.0

 

San Benito

3.9

5.0

 

4.6

 

23.0

25.0

 

14.0

 

San Joaquin

3.1

2.9

 

2.1

 

19.0

15.0

 

12.0

 

Stanislaus

2.8

2.8

 

2.1

 

16.5

15.0

 

14.0

 

Tulare

2.8

3.2

 

2.9

 

20.0

14.0

 

16.0

 

Far North

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Butte

3.8

4.2

 

2.3

 

16.0

20.0

 

16.5

 

Lassen

8.4

9.4

 

9.7

 

63.5

45.0

 

22.0

 

Plumas

6.6

7.2

 

5.8

 

36.0

15.0

 

15.5

 

Shasta

3.6

4.1

 

3.6

 

27.5

23.0

 

19.0

 

Siskiyou

6.7

11.5

 

6.2

 

53.5

29.0

 

24.5

 

Tehama

4.8

4.8

 

3.5

 

69.0

42.0

 

30.0

 

Trinity

12.9

14.6

 

28.8

 

61.0

232.0

 

53.0

 

Other Calif. Counties

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amador

7.0

6.7

 

6.1

 

38.0

37.0

 

16.5

 

Calaveras

4.6

6.1

 

4.1

 

30.5

13.0

 

42.0

 

Del Norte

8.1

7.4

 

5.8

 

49.0

31.0

 

26.5

 

El Dorado

4.6

5.3

 

3.7

 

25.0

22.0

 

18.0

 

Humboldt

5.4

6.9

 

4.8

 

20.0

26.5

 

10.0

 

Lake

6.8

6.5

 

6.2

 

35.0

47.0

 

30.0

 

Mariposa

7.0

4.4

 

6.8

 

37.0

18.0

 

85.0

 

Mendocino

6.4

7.9

 

6.3

 

53.0

58.0

 

72.0

 

Mono

3.2

4.4

 

2.8

 

29.0

66.0

 

8.0

 

Nevada

3.9

5.2

 

4.2

 

42.5

28.0

 

23.0

 

Sutter

4.4

3.5

 

3.4

 

24.5

16.0

 

10.0

 

Tuolumne

5.6

7.3

 

3.2

 

27.5

16.5

 

15.5

 

Yolo

2.6

2.5

 

2.2

 

19.0

20.0

 

14.0

 

Yuba

4.2

4.5

 

2.4

 

30.5

26.5

 

19.5

 

r = revised
NA = not available

 

Article belongs to CAR.org

August
16

Bank Board Approves $40 Million Loan to Help City of San Diego Reduce Greenhouse Gases with New Organic Waste Facility, Create More than 200 Jobs

Aug 31, 2023

Project marks the largest loan issued from the state's Infrastructure State Revolving Fund program

SACRAMENTO (August  29, 2023) — The 

Click Here to Read More...

August
16

The fruit-bea...

Click Here to Read More...

August
16

2nd Qtr. California housing affordability

For release:
August 13, 2024

 Higher home prices and elevated mortgage rates push California housing affordability to near-17-year low in second-quarter 2024, C.A.R. reports

  • Fourteen percent of California households could afford to purchase the $906,600 median-priced home in the second quarter of 2024, down from 17 percent in first-quarter 2024 and down from 16 percent in second-quarter 2023.

  • A minimum annual income of $236,800 was needed to make monthly payments of $5,920, including principal, interest and taxes on a 30-year fixed-rate mortgage at a 7.10 percent interest rate.

  • Twenty-two percent of home buyers were able to purchase the $690,000 median-priced condo or townhome. A minimum annual income of $180,000 was required to make a monthly payment of $4,500.

 LOS ANGELES (Aug. 13) – LOS ANGELES (Aug. 13) – Higher prices combined with elevated mortgage rates that pushed borrowing costs to all-time highs pulled California's housing affordability down to the lowest levels in nearly 17 years during the second quarter of 2024, the CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS® (C.A.R.) said today.

Infographic: https://www.car.org/Global/Infographics/HAI-2024-Q2

Fourteen percent of the state's homebuyers could afford to purchase a median-priced, existing single-family home in California in second-quarter 2024, down from 17 percent in the first quarter of 2024 and down from 16 percent in the second quarter of 2023, according to C.A.R.'s Traditional Housing Affordability Index (HAI).

The second-quarter 2024 figure is less than a third of the affordability index peak of 56 percent in the second quarter of 2012. Despite elevated mortgage rates in the second quarter, recent signs of weakness in macroeconomic reports have pushed rates down in the past few weeks. As the likelihood of the Fed cutting rates at the September meeting increases, housing affordability in California is expected to improve in the next quarter.

C.A.R.'s HAI measures the percentage of all households that can afford to purchase a median-priced, single-family home in California. C.A.R. also reports affordability indices for regions and select counties within the state. The index is considered the most fundamental measure of housing well-being for home buyers in the state.

A minimum annual income of $236,800 was needed to qualify for the purchase of a $906,600 statewide median-priced, existing single-family home in the second quarter of 2024. The monthly payment, including taxes and insurance (PITI) on a 30-year, fixed-rate loan, would be $5,920, assuming a 20 percent down payment and an effective composite interest rate of 7.10 percent. The effective composite interest rate was 6.68 percent in first-quarter 2024 and 6.61 percent in second-quarter 2023.

In the second quarter of 2024, the minimum annual income required exceeded $200,000 for the sixth time in seven quarters, setting a new record high. The monthly PITI for a typical single-family home in California also hit a record high, rising by double digits from both the previous quarter and the same quarter last year.

On a year-over-year basis, statewide home prices jumped 9.0 percent from second-quarter 2023, as competition and low inventory applied upward pressure on home prices. As the market moves past the spring home-buying season and transitions to the off season, home prices will likely decline as market competition cools and housing inventory continues to improve. A consistent drop in mortgage rates expected in the coming months will lower borrowing costs and improve affordability for the rest of the year.

The share of California households that could afford a typical condo/townhome in second-quarter 2024 fell to 22 percent, down from 24 percent recorded in the previous quarter and down from the 25 percent recorded in the second quarter of 2023. An annual income of $180,000 was required to make the monthly payment of $4,500 on the $690,000 median-priced condo/townhome in the second quarter of 2024.

Compared with California, about one-third of the nation's households could afford to purchase a $422,100 median-priced home, which required a minimum annual income of $110,000 to make monthly payments of $2,750. Nationwide affordability was down from 36 percent a year ago.

In the second quarter of 2024, the nationwide minimum required annual income was half that of California's for the fifth consecutive quarter.

Key points from the second-quarter 2024 Housing Affordability report include:

  • When compared to Q124, housing affordability in Q224 declined in 40 counties and remained unchanged in six. Seven counties showed quarter-to-quarter improvement in affordability mainly due to price declines in those counties. When compared to a year ago, six counties registered an improvement in affordability, while 39 counties throughout the state posted a decline on a year-over-year basis, and eight remained unchanged.

  • Lassen (52 percent) remained the most affordable county in California, followed by Glenn (35 percent), Del Norte (34 percent), and Tehama (34 percent). Of all counties in California, Lassen continued to have the lowest minimum qualifying income ($65,200) to purchase a median-priced home in in second-quarter 2024.

  • Mono (5 percent), Monterey (8 percent), and Santa Barbara (9 percent) were the least affordable counties in California, with each of the counties requiring a minimum income of at least $267,600 to purchase a median-priced home in the respective counties. San Mateo continued to require the highest minimum qualifying income ($574,800) to buy a median-priced home in the second quarter of 2024 and, together with Santa Clara ($524,000), were the only two counties in California with a minimum qualifying income more than $500,000. Marin and San Francisco came in third and fourth, requiring a minimum income of $469,200 and $444,000, respectively.

  • Housing affordability declined the most on a year-over-year basis in Plumas, falling nine points from the previous year. Siskiyou recorded the second largest drop in affordability, moving seven percentage points below the same quarter of last year. Merced and Sutter had the third worst drop in affordability, decreasing six percentage points each from a year ago. Despite higher household income, higher home prices and elevated mortgage rates continue to keep housing affordability near its all-time lows across most counties.

See C.A.R.'s historical housing affordability data.
See first-time buyer housing affordability data.

Leading the way…® in California real estate for more than 110 years, the CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS® (www.car.org) is one of the largest state trade organizations in the United States with nearly 200,000 members dedicated to the advancement of professionalism in real estate. C.A.R. is headquartered in Los Angeles.

# # #

CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS®

Traditional Housing Affordability Index
Second quarter 2024

2nd Qtr. 2024

C.A.R. Traditional Housing Affordability Index

STATE/REGION/COUNTY

2nd Qtr. 2024

1st Qtr.

202

 

2nd Qtr. 2023

Median Home Price

Monthly Payment Including Taxes & Insurance

Minimum Qualifying Income

Calif. Single-family homes

14

17

 

16

 

$906,600

$5,920

$236,800

Calif. Condo/Townhomes

22

24

 

25

 

$690,000

$4,500

$180,000

Los Angeles Metro Area

13

15

 

17

 

$840,000

$5,480

$219,200

Inland Empire

20

21

 

22

 

$600,000

$3,910

$156,400

San Francisco Bay Area

18

20

 

19

 

$1,430,000

$9,330

$373,200

United States

33

37

 

36

 

$422,100

$2,750

$110,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

San Francisco Bay Area

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Alameda

16

16

 

16

 

$1,399,500

$9,130

$365,200

Contra Costa

21

25

 

23

 

$925,000

$6,040

$241,600

Marin

16

18

 

16

 

$1,797,000

$11,730

$469,200

Napa

14

18

 

19

 

$962,500

$6,280

$251,200

San Francisco

19

20

 

20

 

$1,701,000

$11,100

$444,000

San Mateo

16

17

 

17

 

$2,202,300

$14,370

$574,800

Santa Clara

16

18

 

18

 

$2,008,000

$13,100

$524,000

Solano

24

26

 

26

 

$600,000

$3,910

$156,400

Sonoma

16

16

 

16

 

$850,000

$5,550

$222,000

Southern California

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Imperial

26

30

 

30

 

$395,000

$2,580

$103,200

Los Angeles

13

14

 

15

 

$854,760

$5,580

$223,200

Orange

11

11

 

12

 

$1,437,500

$9,380

$375,200

Riverside

18

20

 

20

 

$650,000

$4,240

$169,600

San Bernardino

25

27

 

30

 

$510,000

$3,330

$133,200

San Diego

11

11

 

13

 

$1,050,000

$6,850

$274,000

Ventura

12

15

 

14

 

$940,000

$6,130

$245,200

Central Coast

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Monterey

8

11

 

12

 

$1,025,000

$6,690

$267,600

San Luis Obispo

11

10

 

11

 

$889,500

$5,800

$232,000

Santa Barbara

9

11

 

10

 

$1,372,500

$8,960

$358,400

Santa Cruz

13

13

 

13

 

$1,375,000

$8,970

$358,800

Central Valley

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fresno

28

30

 

29

 

$425,000

$2,770

$110,800

Glenn

35

34

 

32

 

$340,450

$2,220

$88,800

Kern

30

31

 

31

 

$385,000

$2,510

$100,400

Kings

29

34

 

32

 

$380,000

$2,480

$99,200

Madera

29

30

 

31

 

$430,000

$2,810

$112,400

Merced

25

29

 

31

 

$415,000

$2,710

$108,400

Placer

28

30

 

29

 

$675,500

$4,410

$176,400

Sacramento

24

26

 

26

 

$555,000

$3,620

$144,800

San Benito

18

21

 

19

 

$805,000

$5,250

$210,000

San Joaquin

24

26

 

26

 

$550,000

$3,590

$143,600

Stanislaus

25

28

 

27

 

$489,250

$3,190

$127,600

Tulare

30

33

 

33

 

$377,000

$2,460

$98,400

Far North

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Butte

27

29

 

29

 

$452,470

$2,950

$118,000

Lassen

52

51

 

52

 

$249,950

$1,630

$65,200

Plumas

29

37

 

38

 

$426,000

$2,780

$111,200

Shasta

33

37

 

35

 

$379,900

$2,480

$99,200

Siskiyou

31

32

 

39

 

$332,000

$2,170

$86,800

Tehama

34

39

 

35

 

$350,000

$2,280

$91,200

Trinity

28

26

 

31

 

$304,600

$1,990

$79,600

Other Calif. Counties

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amador

32

30

 

28

 

$437,450

$2,850

$114,000

Calaveras

29

33

 

27

 

$481,000

$3,140

$125,600

Del Norte

34

34

 

30

 

$345,000

$2,250

$90,000

El Dorado

22

25

 

23

 

$720,000

$4,700

$188,000

Humboldt

22

25

 

25

 

$445,000

$2,900

$116,000

Lake

31

33

 

28

 

$345,000

$2,250

$90,000

Mariposa

25

23

 

24

 

$407,780

$2,660

$106,400

Mendocino

17

21

 

17

 

$525,000

$3,430

$137,200

Mono

5

4

 

5

 

$1,088,190

$7,100

$284,000

Nevada

24

27

 

25

 

$585,000

$3,820

$152,800

Sutter

27

32

 

33

 

$440,000

$2,870

$114,800

Tuolumne

31

36

 

32

 

$437,000

$2,850

$114,000

Yolo

22

24

 

23

 

$640,000

$4,180

$167,200

Yuba

25

26

 

26

 

$446,400

$2,910

$116,400

 

r = revised

Traditional Housing Affordability Indices (HAI) were calculated based on the following effective composite interest rates: 7.10% (2Qtr. 2024), 6.68% (1Qtr. 2023) and 6.61% (2Qtr. 2023).

Article belongs to CAR.org

August
12

Realtors across the US are bracing for a seismic shift in the way they do business. Starting August 17, new rules will roll out that overhaul the way Realtors get paid to help people buy and sell their homes.

The changes, which are part of a $418 million settlement announced in March by the powerful trade group the National Association of Realtors, eliminate informal rules that propped up the industry's traditional payment structure, where home sellers were typically on the hook to pay a 5% or 6% commission, usually split between their agent and the agent representing their home seller.

In the months since the settlement was announced, Realtors across the country have been preparing for the change, attending trainings and poring over the details of new contracts they must sign with prospective homebuyers. Some agents predict the rules will pave the way for new business models and potentially drive many full-service Realtors to leave the industry, while others are more sanguine about the impending changes.

"This is a grand social experiment in an industry at scale," Leo Pareja, CEO of eXp Realty, one of the largest real estate brokerages in the US, said. "I'm bracing my agents for what I call the 'messy middle.' I fully expect a lot of confusion."

In a statement, NAR's president, Kevin Sears, said he was confident NAR members would adapt to the changes, which industry analysts have called the biggest change in America's real estate market in a century.

"These changes help to further empower consumers with clarity and choice when buying and selling a home," Sears said. As August 17 nears, "I am confident in our members' abilities to prepare for and embrace this evolution of our industry and help to guide consumers in the new landscape."

What's about to change?

Historically, a seller's agent charged homesellers a fee, often 5% or 6% of a home's purchase price, that was intended to be shared with the buyer's agent. That meant that homesellers could be on the hook for serious cash: A seller of a $1 million home might pay out $60,000 in commissions. Some experts have said that money was baked into homes' listing prices, inflating the price of homes for sale.

A series of lawsuits alleged this standard practice violated antitrust laws, though the NAR has long argued that the commissions were always negotiable.

Along with a monetary payout, the NAR agreed to two key rule changes as part of an agreement to settle the lawsuits. Both take effect on August 17 and are designed — in theory­ — to shake loose the standard way of paying out commissions.

A judge granted preliminary approval of the NAR's settlement in April, but the final approval hearing is scheduled for November 26.

The first change prohibits agents' compensation from being included on multiple listing services, which are centralized databases used by Realtors to share details about homes for sale. Compensation details can still be advertised elsewhere or communicated in person or over the phone, though.

What do you think?Join 501 others in the comments

The second change requires buyers' agents to discuss their compensation upfront. Come August 17, agents working with a prospective homebuyer must now enter into a written buyer agreement before touring a property together. This agreement is designed to inform buyers that they are responsible for paying their own Realtors if a seller chooses not to cover the cost.

However, prior to the changes, Realtors in 18 states were already required to sign buyer agency agreements. Mary Schumann, a Realtor in Minnesota, said that to her, NAR's changes seem manageable.

"I always tend to wait and see how things shake out before I panic," Schumann said. "We already do buyers agreements here, and this doesn't seem to be incredibly different."

Newer business models see an opportunity

By some estimates, real estate commissions could fall between 25% to 50%, according to a March analysis by TD Cowen Insights. This could pave the way for real estate companies with alternative business models, like flat-fee and discount brokerages, to thrive.

Shelly Cofini, the chief strategy officer at Redy, said she believed the NAR settlement would benefit her company. Redy, which operates nationwide, is a marketplace that allows real estate agents to bid on home listings, meaning agents could pay homesellers for the opportunity to represent them, cutting into their own commissions.

"This is part of this notion of shifting how real estate is always done," Cofini said. "Because agents are in control of the proposal process, they decide on the cash incentive they'll offer and they decide on the commission structure they're willing to offer."

Companies are seeking to capitalize on the impending changes in other ways, too. Flyhomes operates as a traditional real estate brokerage, but earlier this summer, the company launched an AI chatbot designed to answer questions that a homebuyer might traditionally ask their Realtor.

"Consumers don't know this is coming," Flyhomes' chief strategy officer, Adam Hopson, said of the NAR changes. "When they decide they want to buy a home and they find they have to sign a contract, they may say, 'whoa, what is this?' We think this will drive them to find information from other sources. We will be one of those sources."

Will more Realtors call it quits?

Under the old standard, buyers often got representation for free, since their agent's commissions came from the homeseller's pocket.

Many Realtors who spoke to CNN said they believe the new set of rules will reward more experienced Realtors and shut out younger agents, since homebuyers may be wary of signing a legally binding agreement that ties them to a more inexperienced Realtor.

At 19, Madison Mathias, a Realtor in Chapin, South Carolina, said she has had to work overtime to dispel preconceived notions about her age to prospective clients, often re-reading contracts at night to ensure she has the details memorized.

Mathias said she thinks some Realtors will leave the industry, but she doesn't believe age will be a factor.

"I think more agents will fall off because some people don't like change," she said. "Being a new agent, I have had some people question me, but I've never had somebody not want to work with me because of my time in the business. It's all about confidence and educating yourself."

"I'm not really worried about it too much," she added.

Article belongs to CNN.com

⇦ Newer PostsOlder Posts ⇨

Login to My Homefinder

Pixel