The fruit-bea...
For release:
August 20, 2024
California home sales reach five-month high as mortgage rates hit lows, C.A.R. reports
LOS ANGELES (Aug. 20) – Fueled by the lowest interest rates since spring, California home sales rebounded in July to reach a five-month high, the CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS® (C.A.R.) said today.
Infographic: https://www.car.org/Global/Infographics/2024-07-Sales-and-Price
Closed escrow sales of existing, single-family detached homes in California totaled a seasonally adjusted annualized rate of 279,810 in July, according to information collected by C.A.R. from more than 90 local REALTOR® associations and MLSs statewide. The statewide annualized sales figure represents what would be the total number of homes sold during 2024 if sales maintained the July pace throughout the year. It is adjusted to account for seasonal factors that typically influence home sales.
July's sales pace rose 3.6 percent from the revised 270,200 homes sold in June and were up 4.1 percent from a year ago, when a revised 268,840 homes were sold on an annualized basis. The sales pace has remained below the 300,000-threshold for 22 consecutive months, and year-to-date home sales edged up 0.2 percent from the first seven months of 2023.
"California's housing market kicked off the second half of the year with a moderate increase in home sales in July as interest rates continued their downward trend," said C.A.R. President Melanie Barker, a Yosemite REALTOR®. "Despite transitioning into the off-season, the market should remain vibrant in the coming months if the availability of homes for sale continues to improve, and mortgage rates moderate further in the third and fourth quarters."
The statewide median price slipped in July for the second month in a row, after setting a record high in May. July's median price dipped 1.6 percent from $900,720 in June to $886,560 in July. California's median home price was 6.5 percent higher than the $832,530 recorded in July 2023. The year-over-year gain was the 13th straight month of annual price increases, albeit the smallest since January. Home prices could soften further in coming months but should continue to register moderate year-over-year growth for the rest of the year.
Stronger sales momentum in the higher-priced market segment continued to contribute to median price growth. The $1 million-and-higher segment rose year-over-year in July by 24.5 percent, while sales in the sub-$500,000 segment dropped 1.6 percent. While sales of homes priced above $1 million were down for the second straight month, they made up 35.4 percent of all sales in July, near the recent high recorded in May 2024.
"As the economy showed more signs of cooling in the past couple of months, mortgage rates continued to come down, reaching the lowest level in 15 months," said C.A.R. Senior Vice President and Chief Economist Jordan Levine. "This improvement in lower borrowing costs could motivate homebuyers on the sideline to reenter the market, especially since home prices began to soften at the tail end of the homebuying season."
Other key points from C.A.R.'s July 2024 resale housing report include:
Note: The County MLS median price and sales data in the tables are generated from a survey of more than 90 associations of REALTORS® throughout the state and represent statistics of existing single-family detached homes only. County sales data is not adjusted to account for seasonal factors that can influence home sales. Movements in sales prices should not be interpreted as changes in the cost of a standard home. The median price is where half sold for more and half sold for less; medians are more typical than average prices, which are skewed by a relatively small share of transactions at either the lower end or the upper end. Median prices can be influenced by changes in cost, as well as changes in the characteristics and the size of homes sold. The change in median prices should not be construed as actual price changes in specific homes.
*Sales-to-list-price ratio is an indicator that reflects the negotiation power of home buyers and home sellers under current market conditions. The ratio is calculated by dividing the final sales price of a property by its original list price and is expressed as a percentage. A sales-to-list ratio with 100 percent or above suggests that the property sold for more than the list price, and a ratio below 100 percent indicates that the price sold below the asking price.
**Price per square foot is a measure commonly used by real estate agents and brokers to determine how much a square foot of space a buyer will pay for a property. It is calculated as the sale price of the home divided by the number of finished square feet. C.A.R. currently tracks price-per-square foot statistics for 53 counties.
Leading the way…® in California real estate for more than 118 years, the CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS® (www.car.org) is one of the largest state trade organizations in the United States with more than 180,000 members dedicated to the advancement of professionalism in real estate. C.A.R. is headquartered in Los Angeles.
# # #
July 2024 County Sales and Price Activity
(Regional and condo sales data not seasonally adjusted)
|
July 2024 |
Median Sold Price of Existing Single-Family Homes |
Sales |
|||||||
|
State/Region/County |
July 2024 |
June 2024 |
|
July 2023 |
|
Price MTM% Chg |
Price YTY% Chg |
Sales MTM% Chg |
Sales YTY% Chg |
|
Calif. Single-family home |
$886,560 |
$900,720 |
|
$832,530 |
r |
-1.6% |
6.5% |
3.6% |
4.1% |
|
Calif. Condo/Townhome |
$680,000 |
$697,000 |
|
$645,000 |
|
-2.4% |
5.4% |
8.5% |
11.8% |
|
Los Angeles Metro Area |
$849,000 |
$835,000 |
|
$790,000 |
|
1.7% |
7.5% |
3.5% |
11.8% |
|
Central Coast |
$1,064,000 |
$1,072,000 |
|
$985,000 |
|
-0.7% |
8.0% |
9.7% |
5.8% |
|
Central Valley |
$500,000 |
$503,000 |
|
$489,000 |
|
-0.6% |
2.2% |
6.9% |
10.3% |
|
Far North |
$386,450 |
$409,000 |
|
$375,000 |
|
-5.5% |
3.1% |
15.0% |
-0.5% |
|
Inland Empire |
$600,000 |
$600,000 |
|
$575,000 |
|
0.0% |
4.3% |
6.6% |
15.2% |
|
San Francisco Bay Area |
$1,300,000 |
$1,400,000 |
|
$1,255,000 |
|
-7.1% |
3.6% |
1.3% |
19.2% |
|
Southern California |
$881,000 |
$875,000 |
|
$830,000 |
|
0.7% |
6.1% |
4.9% |
11.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
San Francisco Bay Area |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alameda |
$1,280,000 |
$1,369,210 |
|
$1,260,000 |
|
-6.5% |
1.6% |
8.2% |
24.9% |
|
Contra Costa |
$916,500 |
$903,000 |
|
$900,000 |
|
1.5% |
1.8% |
-3.8% |
3.6% |
|
Marin |
$1,594,000 |
$1,800,000 |
|
$1,609,500 |
|
-11.4% |
-1.0% |
4.2% |
16.0% |
|
Napa |
$1,052,500 |
$952,500 |
|
$927,500 |
|
10.5% |
13.5% |
7.6% |
-4.1% |
|
San Francisco |
$1,600,000 |
$1,650,000 |
|
$1,460,000 |
|
-3.0% |
9.6% |
6.1% |
34.8% |
|
San Mateo |
$2,100,000 |
$2,110,000 |
|
$1,984,000 |
|
-0.5% |
5.8% |
-8.5% |
18.2% |
|
Santa Clara |
$1,880,000 |
$1,955,000 |
|
$1,800,000 |
|
-3.8% |
4.4% |
-2.1% |
30.5% |
|
Solano |
$586,400 |
$601,250 |
|
$600,560 |
|
-2.5% |
-2.4% |
0.0% |
15.2% |
|
Sonoma |
$850,000 |
$835,000 |
|
$850,960 |
|
1.8% |
-0.1% |
10.4% |
24.5% |
|
Southern California |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Imperial |
$385,000 |
$385,000 |
|
$387,500 |
|
0.0% |
-0.6% |
-27.9% |
-29.5% |
|
Los Angeles |
$909,010 |
$889,180 |
|
$851,540 |
|
2.2% |
6.7% |
-1.5% |
9.1% |
|
Orange |
$1,390,000 |
$1,450,000 |
|
$1,300,000 |
|
-4.1% |
6.9% |
8.1% |
12.4% |
|
Riverside |
$650,000 |
$643,500 |
|
$615,000 |
|
1.0% |
5.7% |
7.0% |
11.5% |
|
San Bernardino |
$515,000 |
$522,500 |
|
$485,000 |
|
-1.4% |
6.2% |
6.0% |
22.4% |
|
San Diego |
$1,020,000 |
$1,054,180 |
|
$969,020 |
|
-3.2% |
5.3% |
11.8% |
11.1% |
|
Ventura |
$972,000 |
$964,500 |
|
$920,000 |
|
0.8% |
5.7% |
5.4% |
7.9% |
|
Central Coast |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Monterey |
$945,000 |
$1,039,000 |
|
$949,000 |
|
-9.0% |
-0.4% |
10.2% |
1.4% |
|
San Luis Obispo |
$1,035,000 |
$890,000 |
|
$860,000 |
|
16.3% |
20.3% |
8.4% |
1.5% |
|
Santa Barbara |
$827,500 |
$1,355,500 |
|
$994,470 |
|
-39.0% |
-16.8% |
6.0% |
15.8% |
|
Santa Cruz |
$1,355,000 |
$1,413,000 |
|
$1,300,000 |
|
-4.1% |
4.2% |
17.0% |
5.6% |
|
Central Valley |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresno |
$420,000 |
$428,890 |
|
$417,500 |
|
-2.1% |
0.6% |
3.2% |
6.9% |
|
Glenn |
$330,500 |
$350,000 |
|
$372,500 |
|
-5.6% |
-11.3% |
100.0% |
-11.1% |
|
Kern |
$413,000 |
$375,000 |
|
$395,000 |
|
10.1% |
4.6% |
-2.9% |
11.4% |
|
Kings |
$369,000 |
$391,400 |
|
$385,000 |
|
-5.7% |
-4.2% |
47.3% |
2.5% |
|
Madera |
$424,350 |
$415,070 |
|
$426,000 |
|
2.2% |
-0.4% |
28.2% |
21.0% |
|
Merced |
$413,500 |
$421,000 |
|
$390,000 |
|
-1.8% |
6.0% |
-10.4% |
6.2% |
|
Placer |
$670,000 |
$685,000 |
|
$660,000 |
|
-2.2% |
1.5% |
1.8% |
8.3% |
|
Sacramento |
$560,000 |
$560,000 |
|
$547,000 |
|
0.0% |
2.4% |
13.7% |
14.9% |
|
San Benito |
$778,000 |
$854,000 |
|
$745,000 |
|
-8.9% |
4.4% |
27.6% |
37.0% |
|
San Joaquin |
$585,000 |
$550,000 |
|
$545,000 |
|
6.4% |
7.3% |
-1.7% |
0.2% |
|
Stanislaus |
$485,000 |
$495,000 |
|
$465,000 |
|
-2.0% |
4.3% |
5.2% |
12.0% |
|
Tulare |
$380,000 |
$375,000 |
|
$370,520 |
|
1.3% |
2.6% |
16.1% |
14.5% |
|
Far North |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Butte |
$430,000 |
$475,900 |
|
$429,000 |
|
-9.6% |
0.2% |
9.9% |
-19.1% |
|
Lassen |
$265,000 |
$267,500 |
|
$280,000 |
|
-0.9% |
-5.4% |
14.3% |
33.3% |
|
Plumas |
$528,000 |
$465,000 |
|
$364,050 |
|
13.5% |
45.0% |
17.9% |
-2.9% |
|
Shasta |
$394,450 |
$396,950 |
|
$379,000 |
|
-0.6% |
4.1% |
13.0% |
6.9% |
|
Siskiyou |
$326,770 |
$362,120 |
|
$296,000 |
|
-9.8% |
10.4% |
69.2% |
10.0% |
|
Tehama |
$290,000 |
$375,000 |
|
$320,000 |
|
-22.7% |
-9.4% |
-3.3% |
-17.1% |
|
Trinity |
$297,500 |
$322,100 |
|
$320,000 |
|
-7.6% |
-7.0% |
0.0% |
100.0% |
|
Other Calif. Counties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amador |
$399,000 |
$450,000 |
|
$442,000 |
|
-11.3% |
-9.7% |
0.0% |
12.5% |
|
Calaveras |
$474,000 |
$495,000 |
|
$476,500 |
|
-4.2% |
-0.5% |
30.3% |
34.4% |
|
Del Norte |
$400,000 |
$350,000 |
|
$349,000 |
|
14.3% |
14.6% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
|
El Dorado |
$695,000 |
$709,000 |
|
$650,000 |
|
-2.0% |
6.9% |
21.9% |
5.1% |
|
Humboldt |
$442,500 |
$490,620 |
|
$465,000 |
|
-9.8% |
-4.8% |
25.0% |
12.2% |
|
Lake |
$350,000 |
$352,500 |
|
$335,000 |
|
-0.7% |
4.5% |
-3.1% |
-4.6% |
|
Mariposa |
$472,500 |
$374,500 |
|
$459,000 |
|
26.2% |
2.9% |
-25.0% |
-14.3% |
|
Mendocino |
$549,500 |
$521,690 |
|
$540,000 |
|
5.3% |
1.8% |
25.0% |
13.2% |
|
Mono |
$680,000 |
$1,240,000 |
|
$785,000 |
|
-45.2% |
-13.4% |
57.1% |
0.0% |
|
Nevada |
$609,480 |
$625,000 |
|
$579,900 |
|
-2.5% |
5.1% |
31.2% |
18.4% |
|
Sutter |
$435,000 |
$500,000 |
|
$402,000 |
|
-13.0% |
8.2% |
-20.0% |
-10.0% |
|
Tuolumne |
$385,000 |
$439,500 |
|
$463,500 |
|
-12.4% |
-16.9% |
25.9% |
-24.4% |
|
Yolo |
$610,000 |
$649,500 |
|
$625,000 |
|
-6.1% |
-2.4% |
0.0% |
5.6% |
|
Yuba |
$438,400 |
$446,750 |
|
$415,000 |
|
-1.9% |
5.6% |
18.8% |
-2.6% |
r = revised
NA = not available
July 2024 County Unsold Inventory and Days on Market
(Regional and condo sales data not seasonally adjusted)
|
July 2024 |
Unsold Inventory Index |
Median Time on Market |
||||||||
|
State/Region/County |
July 2024 |
June 2024 |
|
July 2023 |
|
July 2024 |
June 2024 |
|
July 2023 |
|
|
Calif. Single-family home |
2.9 |
3.0 |
|
2.5 |
|
20.0 |
18.0 |
|
16.0 |
|
|
Calif. Condo/Townhome |
3.0 |
3.2 |
|
2.4 |
|
22.0 |
20.0 |
|
16.0 |
|
|
Los Angeles Metro Area |
3.0 |
3.2 |
|
2.7 |
|
22.0 |
21.0 |
|
19.0 |
|
|
Central Coast |
3.3 |
3.5 |
|
2.7 |
|
18.0 |
16.0 |
|
14.0 |
|
|
Central Valley |
2.8 |
2.8 |
|
2.4 |
|
19.0 |
17.0 |
|
14.0 |
|
|
Far North |
4.6 |
5.4 |
|
4.1 |
|
33.0 |
24.0 |
|
21.0 |
|
|
Inland Empire |
3.4 |
3.7 |
|
3.1 |
|
27.0 |
26.5 |
|
22.0 |
|
|
San Francisco Bay Area |
2.0 |
2.0 |
|
1.8 |
|
17.0 |
14.0 |
|
14.0 |
|
|
Southern California |
2.9 |
3.1 |
|
2.5 |
|
21.0 |
20.0 |
|
17.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
San Francisco Bay Area |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alameda |
1.6 |
1.8 |
|
1.3 |
|
13.0 |
12.0 |
|
11.0 |
|
|
Contra Costa |
1.8 |
1.8 |
|
1.4 |
|
13.0 |
12.5 |
|
12.0 |
|
|
Marin |
1.8 |
2.3 |
|
1.7 |
|
57.0 |
39.0 |
|
43.0 |
|
|
Napa |
5.5 |
5.6 |
|
4.0 |
|
63.0 |
52.0 |
|
54.5 |
|
|
San Francisco |
1.4 |
1.8 |
|
2.1 |
|
27.0 |
34.0 |
|
35.0 |
|
|
San Mateo |
2.0 |
1.7 |
|
2.1 |
|
12.0 |
11.0 |
|
11.0 |
|
|
Santa Clara |
1.6 |
1.5 |
|
1.6 |
|
9.0 |
8.0 |
|
8.0 |
|
|
Solano |
2.7 |
2.7 |
|
2.1 |
|
44.0 |
35.0 |
|
35.0 |
|
|
Sonoma |
3.1 |
3.4 |
|
3.1 |
|
54.0 |
45.0 |
|
46.0 |
|
|
Southern California |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Imperial |
3.4 |
2.1 |
|
NA |
|
24.0 |
13.0 |
|
13.0 |
|
|
Los Angeles |
3.0 |
3.1 |
|
2.5 |
|
19.0 |
19.0 |
|
17.0 |
|
|
Orange |
2.5 |
2.5 |
|
2.3 |
|
20.0 |
18.0 |
|
18.0 |
|
|
Riverside |
3.1 |
3.3 |
|
2.7 |
|
28.0 |
27.0 |
|
23.0 |
|
|
San Bernardino |
4.0 |
4.2 |
|
4.0 |
|
25.0 |
25.0 |
|
19.0 |
|
|
San Diego |
2.6 |
2.7 |
|
2.0 |
|
16.0 |
14.0 |
|
12.0 |
|
|
Ventura |
2.8 |
2.8 |
|
2.3 |
|
30.0 |
27.0 |
|
25.0 |
|
|
Central Coast |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Monterey |
3.8 |
4.3 |
|
3.2 |
|
17.0 |
10.5 |
|
13.0 |
|
|
San Luis Obispo |
2.9 |
3.1 |
|
2.4 |
|
23.0 |
22.0 |
|
21.0 |
|
|
Santa Barbara |
3.3 |
3.3 |
|
2.7 |
|
16.5 |
13.0 |
|
10.0 |
|
|
Santa Cruz |
3.2 |
3.4 |
|
2.7 |
|
17.0 |
15.0 |
|
14.0 |
|
|
Central Valley |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresno |
2.9 |
2.9 |
|
2.6 |
|
15.0 |
15.0 |
|
12.0 |
|
|
Glenn |
2.6 |
5.8 |
|
2.8 |
|
27.0 |
23.0 |
|
19.5 |
|
|
Kern |
2.5 |
2.3 |
|
2.3 |
|
19.0 |
17.0 |
|
12.0 |
|
|
Kings |
2.1 |
3.4 |
|
2.0 |
|
17.0 |
16.0 |
|
12.0 |
|
|
Madera |
4.2 |
5.2 |
|
4.0 |
|
23.0 |
32.5 |
|
32.0 |
|
|
Merced |
2.8 |
2.4 |
|
2.8 |
|
23.5 |
20.0 |
|
16.0 |
|
|
Placer |
2.8 |
2.6 |
|
2.3 |
|
21.0 |
24.0 |
|
18.0 |
|
|
Sacramento |
2.4 |
2.5 |
|
1.9 |
|
19.0 |
17.0 |
|
13.0 |
|
|
San Benito |
3.9 |
5.0 |
|
4.6 |
|
23.0 |
25.0 |
|
14.0 |
|
|
San Joaquin |
3.1 |
2.9 |
|
2.1 |
|
19.0 |
15.0 |
|
12.0 |
|
|
Stanislaus |
2.8 |
2.8 |
|
2.1 |
|
16.5 |
15.0 |
|
14.0 |
|
|
Tulare |
2.8 |
3.2 |
|
2.9 |
|
20.0 |
14.0 |
|
16.0 |
|
|
Far North |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Butte |
3.8 |
4.2 |
|
2.3 |
|
16.0 |
20.0 |
|
16.5 |
|
|
Lassen |
8.4 |
9.4 |
|
9.7 |
|
63.5 |
45.0 |
|
22.0 |
|
|
Plumas |
6.6 |
7.2 |
|
5.8 |
|
36.0 |
15.0 |
|
15.5 |
|
|
Shasta |
3.6 |
4.1 |
|
3.6 |
|
27.5 |
23.0 |
|
19.0 |
|
|
Siskiyou |
6.7 |
11.5 |
|
6.2 |
|
53.5 |
29.0 |
|
24.5 |
|
|
Tehama |
4.8 |
4.8 |
|
3.5 |
|
69.0 |
42.0 |
|
30.0 |
|
|
Trinity |
12.9 |
14.6 |
|
28.8 |
|
61.0 |
232.0 |
|
53.0 |
|
|
Other Calif. Counties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amador |
7.0 |
6.7 |
|
6.1 |
|
38.0 |
37.0 |
|
16.5 |
|
|
Calaveras |
4.6 |
6.1 |
|
4.1 |
|
30.5 |
13.0 |
|
42.0 |
|
|
Del Norte |
8.1 |
7.4 |
|
5.8 |
|
49.0 |
31.0 |
|
26.5 |
|
|
El Dorado |
4.6 |
5.3 |
|
3.7 |
|
25.0 |
22.0 |
|
18.0 |
|
|
Humboldt |
5.4 |
6.9 |
|
4.8 |
|
20.0 |
26.5 |
|
10.0 |
|
|
Lake |
6.8 |
6.5 |
|
6.2 |
|
35.0 |
47.0 |
|
30.0 |
|
|
Mariposa |
7.0 |
4.4 |
|
6.8 |
|
37.0 |
18.0 |
|
85.0 |
|
|
Mendocino |
6.4 |
7.9 |
|
6.3 |
|
53.0 |
58.0 |
|
72.0 |
|
|
Mono |
3.2 |
4.4 |
|
2.8 |
|
29.0 |
66.0 |
|
8.0 |
|
|
Nevada |
3.9 |
5.2 |
|
4.2 |
|
42.5 |
28.0 |
|
23.0 |
|
|
Sutter |
4.4 |
3.5 |
|
3.4 |
|
24.5 |
16.0 |
|
10.0 |
|
|
Tuolumne |
5.6 |
7.3 |
|
3.2 |
|
27.5 |
16.5 |
|
15.5 |
|
|
Yolo |
2.6 |
2.5 |
|
2.2 |
|
19.0 |
20.0 |
|
14.0 |
|
|
Yuba |
4.2 |
4.5 |
|
2.4 |
|
30.5 |
26.5 |
|
19.5 |
|
r = revised
NA = not available
Article belongs to CAR.org
For release:
August 13, 2024
Higher home prices and elevated mortgage rates push California housing affordability to near-17-year low in second-quarter 2024, C.A.R. reports
LOS ANGELES (Aug. 13) – LOS ANGELES (Aug. 13) – Higher prices combined with elevated mortgage rates that pushed borrowing costs to all-time highs pulled California's housing affordability down to the lowest levels in nearly 17 years during the second quarter of 2024, the CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS® (C.A.R.) said today.
Infographic: https://www.car.org/Global/Infographics/HAI-2024-Q2
Fourteen percent of the state's homebuyers could afford to purchase a median-priced, existing single-family home in California in second-quarter 2024, down from 17 percent in the first quarter of 2024 and down from 16 percent in the second quarter of 2023, according to C.A.R.'s Traditional Housing Affordability Index (HAI).
The second-quarter 2024 figure is less than a third of the affordability index peak of 56 percent in the second quarter of 2012. Despite elevated mortgage rates in the second quarter, recent signs of weakness in macroeconomic reports have pushed rates down in the past few weeks. As the likelihood of the Fed cutting rates at the September meeting increases, housing affordability in California is expected to improve in the next quarter.
C.A.R.'s HAI measures the percentage of all households that can afford to purchase a median-priced, single-family home in California. C.A.R. also reports affordability indices for regions and select counties within the state. The index is considered the most fundamental measure of housing well-being for home buyers in the state.
A minimum annual income of $236,800 was needed to qualify for the purchase of a $906,600 statewide median-priced, existing single-family home in the second quarter of 2024. The monthly payment, including taxes and insurance (PITI) on a 30-year, fixed-rate loan, would be $5,920, assuming a 20 percent down payment and an effective composite interest rate of 7.10 percent. The effective composite interest rate was 6.68 percent in first-quarter 2024 and 6.61 percent in second-quarter 2023.
In the second quarter of 2024, the minimum annual income required exceeded $200,000 for the sixth time in seven quarters, setting a new record high. The monthly PITI for a typical single-family home in California also hit a record high, rising by double digits from both the previous quarter and the same quarter last year.
On a year-over-year basis, statewide home prices jumped 9.0 percent from second-quarter 2023, as competition and low inventory applied upward pressure on home prices. As the market moves past the spring home-buying season and transitions to the off season, home prices will likely decline as market competition cools and housing inventory continues to improve. A consistent drop in mortgage rates expected in the coming months will lower borrowing costs and improve affordability for the rest of the year.
The share of California households that could afford a typical condo/townhome in second-quarter 2024 fell to 22 percent, down from 24 percent recorded in the previous quarter and down from the 25 percent recorded in the second quarter of 2023. An annual income of $180,000 was required to make the monthly payment of $4,500 on the $690,000 median-priced condo/townhome in the second quarter of 2024.
Compared with California, about one-third of the nation's households could afford to purchase a $422,100 median-priced home, which required a minimum annual income of $110,000 to make monthly payments of $2,750. Nationwide affordability was down from 36 percent a year ago.
In the second quarter of 2024, the nationwide minimum required annual income was half that of California's for the fifth consecutive quarter.
Key points from the second-quarter 2024 Housing Affordability report include:
See C.A.R.'s historical housing affordability data.
See first-time buyer housing affordability data.
Leading the way…® in California real estate for more than 110 years, the CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS® (www.car.org) is one of the largest state trade organizations in the United States with nearly 200,000 members dedicated to the advancement of professionalism in real estate. C.A.R. is headquartered in Los Angeles.
# # #
CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS®
Traditional Housing Affordability Index
Second quarter 2024
|
2nd Qtr. 2024 |
C.A.R. Traditional Housing Affordability Index |
|||||||
|
STATE/REGION/COUNTY |
2nd Qtr. 2024 |
1st Qtr. 202 |
|
2nd Qtr. 2023 |
|
Median Home Price |
Monthly Payment Including Taxes & Insurance |
Minimum Qualifying Income |
|
Calif. Single-family homes |
14 |
17 |
|
16 |
|
$906,600 |
$5,920 |
$236,800 |
|
Calif. Condo/Townhomes |
22 |
24 |
|
25 |
|
$690,000 |
$4,500 |
$180,000 |
|
Los Angeles Metro Area |
13 |
15 |
|
17 |
|
$840,000 |
$5,480 |
$219,200 |
|
Inland Empire |
20 |
21 |
|
22 |
|
$600,000 |
$3,910 |
$156,400 |
|
San Francisco Bay Area |
18 |
20 |
|
19 |
|
$1,430,000 |
$9,330 |
$373,200 |
|
United States |
33 |
37 |
|
36 |
|
$422,100 |
$2,750 |
$110,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
San Francisco Bay Area |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alameda |
16 |
16 |
|
16 |
|
$1,399,500 |
$9,130 |
$365,200 |
|
Contra Costa |
21 |
25 |
|
23 |
|
$925,000 |
$6,040 |
$241,600 |
|
Marin |
16 |
18 |
|
16 |
|
$1,797,000 |
$11,730 |
$469,200 |
|
Napa |
14 |
18 |
|
19 |
|
$962,500 |
$6,280 |
$251,200 |
|
San Francisco |
19 |
20 |
|
20 |
|
$1,701,000 |
$11,100 |
$444,000 |
|
San Mateo |
16 |
17 |
|
17 |
|
$2,202,300 |
$14,370 |
$574,800 |
|
Santa Clara |
16 |
18 |
|
18 |
|
$2,008,000 |
$13,100 |
$524,000 |
|
Solano |
24 |
26 |
|
26 |
|
$600,000 |
$3,910 |
$156,400 |
|
Sonoma |
16 |
16 |
|
16 |
|
$850,000 |
$5,550 |
$222,000 |
|
Southern California |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Imperial |
26 |
30 |
|
30 |
|
$395,000 |
$2,580 |
$103,200 |
|
Los Angeles |
13 |
14 |
|
15 |
|
$854,760 |
$5,580 |
$223,200 |
|
Orange |
11 |
11 |
|
12 |
|
$1,437,500 |
$9,380 |
$375,200 |
|
Riverside |
18 |
20 |
|
20 |
|
$650,000 |
$4,240 |
$169,600 |
|
San Bernardino |
25 |
27 |
|
30 |
|
$510,000 |
$3,330 |
$133,200 |
|
San Diego |
11 |
11 |
|
13 |
|
$1,050,000 |
$6,850 |
$274,000 |
|
Ventura |
12 |
15 |
|
14 |
|
$940,000 |
$6,130 |
$245,200 |
|
Central Coast |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Monterey |
8 |
11 |
|
12 |
|
$1,025,000 |
$6,690 |
$267,600 |
|
San Luis Obispo |
11 |
10 |
|
11 |
|
$889,500 |
$5,800 |
$232,000 |
|
Santa Barbara |
9 |
11 |
|
10 |
|
$1,372,500 |
$8,960 |
$358,400 |
|
Santa Cruz |
13 |
13 |
|
13 |
|
$1,375,000 |
$8,970 |
$358,800 |
|
Central Valley |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresno |
28 |
30 |
|
29 |
|
$425,000 |
$2,770 |
$110,800 |
|
Glenn |
35 |
34 |
|
32 |
|
$340,450 |
$2,220 |
$88,800 |
|
Kern |
30 |
31 |
|
31 |
|
$385,000 |
$2,510 |
$100,400 |
|
Kings |
29 |
34 |
|
32 |
|
$380,000 |
$2,480 |
$99,200 |
|
Madera |
29 |
30 |
|
31 |
|
$430,000 |
$2,810 |
$112,400 |
|
Merced |
25 |
29 |
|
31 |
|
$415,000 |
$2,710 |
$108,400 |
|
Placer |
28 |
30 |
|
29 |
|
$675,500 |
$4,410 |
$176,400 |
|
Sacramento |
24 |
26 |
|
26 |
|
$555,000 |
$3,620 |
$144,800 |
|
San Benito |
18 |
21 |
|
19 |
|
$805,000 |
$5,250 |
$210,000 |
|
San Joaquin |
24 |
26 |
|
26 |
|
$550,000 |
$3,590 |
$143,600 |
|
Stanislaus |
25 |
28 |
|
27 |
|
$489,250 |
$3,190 |
$127,600 |
|
Tulare |
30 |
33 |
|
33 |
|
$377,000 |
$2,460 |
$98,400 |
|
Far North |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Butte |
27 |
29 |
|
29 |
|
$452,470 |
$2,950 |
$118,000 |
|
Lassen |
52 |
51 |
|
52 |
|
$249,950 |
$1,630 |
$65,200 |
|
Plumas |
29 |
37 |
|
38 |
|
$426,000 |
$2,780 |
$111,200 |
|
Shasta |
33 |
37 |
|
35 |
|
$379,900 |
$2,480 |
$99,200 |
|
Siskiyou |
31 |
32 |
|
39 |
|
$332,000 |
$2,170 |
$86,800 |
|
Tehama |
34 |
39 |
|
35 |
|
$350,000 |
$2,280 |
$91,200 |
|
Trinity |
28 |
26 |
|
31 |
|
$304,600 |
$1,990 |
$79,600 |
|
Other Calif. Counties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amador |
32 |
30 |
|
28 |
|
$437,450 |
$2,850 |
$114,000 |
|
Calaveras |
29 |
33 |
|
27 |
|
$481,000 |
$3,140 |
$125,600 |
|
Del Norte |
34 |
34 |
|
30 |
|
$345,000 |
$2,250 |
$90,000 |
|
El Dorado |
22 |
25 |
|
23 |
|
$720,000 |
$4,700 |
$188,000 |
|
Humboldt |
22 |
25 |
|
25 |
|
$445,000 |
$2,900 |
$116,000 |
|
Lake |
31 |
33 |
|
28 |
|
$345,000 |
$2,250 |
$90,000 |
|
Mariposa |
25 |
23 |
|
24 |
|
$407,780 |
$2,660 |
$106,400 |
|
Mendocino |
17 |
21 |
|
17 |
|
$525,000 |
$3,430 |
$137,200 |
|
Mono |
5 |
4 |
|
5 |
|
$1,088,190 |
$7,100 |
$284,000 |
|
Nevada |
24 |
27 |
|
25 |
|
$585,000 |
$3,820 |
$152,800 |
|
Sutter |
27 |
32 |
|
33 |
|
$440,000 |
$2,870 |
$114,800 |
|
Tuolumne |
31 |
36 |
|
32 |
|
$437,000 |
$2,850 |
$114,000 |
|
Yolo |
22 |
24 |
|
23 |
|
$640,000 |
$4,180 |
$167,200 |
|
Yuba |
25 |
26 |
|
26 |
|
$446,400 |
$2,910 |
$116,400 |
r = revised
Traditional Housing Affordability Indices (HAI) were calculated based on the following effective composite interest rates: 7.10% (2Qtr. 2024), 6.68% (1Qtr. 2023) and 6.61% (2Qtr. 2023).
Article belongs to CAR.org
Realtors across the US are bracing for a seismic shift in the way they do business. Starting August 17, new rules will roll out that overhaul the way Realtors get paid to help people buy and sell their homes.
The changes, which are part of a $418 million settlement announced in March by the powerful trade group the National Association of Realtors, eliminate informal rules that propped up the industry's traditional payment structure, where home sellers were typically on the hook to pay a 5% or 6% commission, usually split between their agent and the agent representing their home seller.
In the months since the settlement was announced, Realtors across the country have been preparing for the change, attending trainings and poring over the details of new contracts they must sign with prospective homebuyers. Some agents predict the rules will pave the way for new business models and potentially drive many full-service Realtors to leave the industry, while others are more sanguine about the impending changes.
"This is a grand social experiment in an industry at scale," Leo Pareja, CEO of eXp Realty, one of the largest real estate brokerages in the US, said. "I'm bracing my agents for what I call the 'messy middle.' I fully expect a lot of confusion."
In a statement, NAR's president, Kevin Sears, said he was confident NAR members would adapt to the changes, which industry analysts have called the biggest change in America's real estate market in a century.
"These changes help to further empower consumers with clarity and choice when buying and selling a home," Sears said. As August 17 nears, "I am confident in our members' abilities to prepare for and embrace this evolution of our industry and help to guide consumers in the new landscape."
Historically, a seller's agent charged homesellers a fee, often 5% or 6% of a home's purchase price, that was intended to be shared with the buyer's agent. That meant that homesellers could be on the hook for serious cash: A seller of a $1 million home might pay out $60,000 in commissions. Some experts have said that money was baked into homes' listing prices, inflating the price of homes for sale.
A series of lawsuits alleged this standard practice violated antitrust laws, though the NAR has long argued that the commissions were always negotiable.
Along with a monetary payout, the NAR agreed to two key rule changes as part of an agreement to settle the lawsuits. Both take effect on August 17 and are designed — in theory — to shake loose the standard way of paying out commissions.
A judge granted preliminary approval of the NAR's settlement in April, but the final approval hearing is scheduled for November 26.
The first change prohibits agents' compensation from being included on multiple listing services, which are centralized databases used by Realtors to share details about homes for sale. Compensation details can still be advertised elsewhere or communicated in person or over the phone, though.
The second change requires buyers' agents to discuss their compensation upfront. Come August 17, agents working with a prospective homebuyer must now enter into a written buyer agreement before touring a property together. This agreement is designed to inform buyers that they are responsible for paying their own Realtors if a seller chooses not to cover the cost.
However, prior to the changes, Realtors in 18 states were already required to sign buyer agency agreements. Mary Schumann, a Realtor in Minnesota, said that to her, NAR's changes seem manageable.
"I always tend to wait and see how things shake out before I panic," Schumann said. "We already do buyers agreements here, and this doesn't seem to be incredibly different."
By some estimates, real estate commissions could fall between 25% to 50%, according to a March analysis by TD Cowen Insights. This could pave the way for real estate companies with alternative business models, like flat-fee and discount brokerages, to thrive.
Shelly Cofini, the chief strategy officer at Redy, said she believed the NAR settlement would benefit her company. Redy, which operates nationwide, is a marketplace that allows real estate agents to bid on home listings, meaning agents could pay homesellers for the opportunity to represent them, cutting into their own commissions.
"This is part of this notion of shifting how real estate is always done," Cofini said. "Because agents are in control of the proposal process, they decide on the cash incentive they'll offer and they decide on the commission structure they're willing to offer."
Companies are seeking to capitalize on the impending changes in other ways, too. Flyhomes operates as a traditional real estate brokerage, but earlier this summer, the company launched an AI chatbot designed to answer questions that a homebuyer might traditionally ask their Realtor.
"Consumers don't know this is coming," Flyhomes' chief strategy officer, Adam Hopson, said of the NAR changes. "When they decide they want to buy a home and they find they have to sign a contract, they may say, 'whoa, what is this?' We think this will drive them to find information from other sources. We will be one of those sources."
Under the old standard, buyers often got representation for free, since their agent's commissions came from the homeseller's pocket.
Many Realtors who spoke to CNN said they believe the new set of rules will reward more experienced Realtors and shut out younger agents, since homebuyers may be wary of signing a legally binding agreement that ties them to a more inexperienced Realtor.
At 19, Madison Mathias, a Realtor in Chapin, South Carolina, said she has had to work overtime to dispel preconceived notions about her age to prospective clients, often re-reading contracts at night to ensure she has the details memorized.
Mathias said she thinks some Realtors will leave the industry, but she doesn't believe age will be a factor.
"I think more agents will fall off because some people don't like change," she said. "Being a new agent, I have had some people question me, but I've never had somebody not want to work with me because of my time in the business. It's all about confidence and educating yourself."
"I'm not really worried about it too much," she added.
Article belongs to CNN.com